Multi-model workspace

One AI Workspace for Every Model Your Team Needs

Give employees controlled access to leading AI models through one shared workspace, without forcing the entire company to depend on a single provider.

  • OpenAI, Claude, Gemini, xAI, Mistral, DeepSeek and Qwen
  • Admins decide which models the workspace can reach
  • 7-day free trial, no credit card required
Intrascope chat interface with vendor, model and manifest selectors in the message composer
Vendor, model and manifest are chosen in the composer, so switching models is a dropdown rather than a new subscription.

The problem

Model choice today is whatever each employee happened to buy

Without a company workspace, model access becomes a personal purchasing decision. People use the tool they already pay for, not the one that fits the task.

One provider per person

A designer is on ChatGPT Plus, a strategist is on Claude Pro and an analyst uses a free Gemini account. Nobody can compare outputs and nobody can switch when a provider has a bad week.

Separate logins, separate invoices

Every provider means another account, another renewal date and another line item. Finance sees charges, not what the company got for them.

No admin control over models

There is no way to define which models the company is comfortable using, or to keep expensive reasoning models out of routine drafting work.

Work does not move between models

Instructions and project background live inside one vendor's chat history, so trying a different model means rebuilding the brief from scratch.

The solution

One workspace, every approved provider, admin controls included

Intrascope connects the providers your company approves and puts them behind a single interface with projects, reusable context and usage tracking.

Access every major provider

OpenAI, Anthropic Claude, Google Gemini, xAI, Mistral, DeepSeek and Qwen are available from the same chat, alongside the Intrascope managed model.

Admins choose what is enabled

Turn entire vendors or individual models on and off for the workspace, so the model list your team sees is the list you approved.

Match the model to the task

Switch models inside a conversation. Use a light model for a summary and a reasoning model for the analysis that follows.

Context that follows the model

Manifests carry tone, company knowledge and response rules across providers, so changing model does not mean rewriting the brief.

Projects instead of private chats

Group conversations, users and context by client, department or initiative rather than by whoever started the thread.

Usage visible per model

See tokens and cost by vendor and model, so model choice becomes a decision you can review instead of a habit.

See the model selector with your own providers

A short walkthrough covers provider setup, model controls and how your team would switch models day to day.

How it works

From scattered accounts to one model workspace

Most teams get through this in an afternoon, starting with one project and one company manifest.

  1. 01

    Connect your providers

    Add your company API keys, or start with Intrascope-managed usage and skip provider onboarding entirely.

  2. 02

    Enable the models you approve

    In Limits, switch vendors and individual models on or off for the workspace and set spending caps where they matter.

  3. 03

    Invite your team into projects

    Create projects per client, department or initiative, then give each person access to the ones they work on.

  4. 04

    Work and review from one place

    Your team chats and switches models while admins watch tokens, cost and model mix from the usage dashboard.

Inside the product

What multi-model access actually looks like

Three screens do most of the work: the provider list, the model controls and the chat your team uses every day.

Intrascope LLM Providers screen listing Anthropic Claude, DeepSeek, Google Gemini, Mistral, OpenAI, Qwen and xAI with enable toggles
Every supported vendor in one list, with the number of models each one exposes and a single toggle to enable or disable it.
Intrascope AI Model Limits and Restrictions screen showing vendor controls and per-model spending limits
Model controls decide which of the available models your team can reach, and what each one is allowed to spend.
Projects
๐Ÿ“

Marketing Q2

4 members124K tokens
๐Ÿ“

Client - Acme Corp

3 members89K tokens
๐Ÿ“

Product Research

6 members201K tokens
๐Ÿ“

Support Playbooks

2 members45K tokens
Projects keep conversations, users and context together, so model choice never separates work from its background.

Business outcome

What changes once model access is centralized

Less dependence on one provider

If a provider raises prices, degrades quality or goes down, your team changes model instead of migrating the company.

Right model for the right task

Routine drafting runs on light models while premium reasoning is reserved for work that genuinely needs it.

Fewer subscriptions to administer

One workspace plan and one usage balance instead of individual seats spread across several vendors.

Faster onboarding

A new employee gets approved models and existing project context on day one, without a purchase request.

Output you can compare

Run the same brief through two providers with the same manifest and keep the stronger result.

A model policy you can enforce

Model rules stop being a document nobody reads and become a workspace setting.

Before and after

Model access without Intrascope, and with it

The difference is not the number of models available on the market. It is who decides which ones your company uses, and whether anyone can see the result.

Model choice

Without Intrascope

Limited to whatever each person subscribed to.

With Intrascope

Every approved model available to every approved user.

Switching models

Without Intrascope

Copy the prompt into another tool and rebuild the context.

With Intrascope

Change the model in the composer and keep the manifest and project.

Admin control

Without Intrascope

None. Access is a personal purchase decision.

With Intrascope

Vendors and individual models enabled or blocked for the workspace.

Cost visibility

Without Intrascope

Separate invoices per provider with no per-task view.

With Intrascope

Tokens and cost by model, user and project in one dashboard.

Company knowledge

Without Intrascope

Sits in individual chat histories.

With Intrascope

Sits in manifests and projects the team shares.

Adding a provider

Without Intrascope

New subscriptions, new logins, new approvals.

With Intrascope

Add a key or enable managed usage, then toggle the models.

How teams use it

Workflows that need more than one model

These are the patterns that appear once a team stops thinking in subscriptions and starts thinking in tasks.

Routine work on light models

Meeting notes, translations and internal summaries run on small models where the quality is fine and the cost is a fraction of a premium call.

Reasoning models for the hard part

A consultant drafts a structure on a light model, then sends the argument to a reasoning model for pressure testing.

Side-by-side comparison

A marketing lead runs one campaign brief through two providers with the same manifest applied, and keeps the stronger version.

Different work, different tiers

Long-context models handle documentation reviews while fast, cheap models handle everyday chat, and the usage dashboard shows what each choice costs.

Continuity during provider issues

When one vendor is degraded, the team selects another enabled model and the day continues.

FAQ

Questions teams ask before they switch

OpenAI, Anthropic Claude, Google Gemini, xAI, Mistral, DeepSeek and Qwen are supported, along with the Intrascope managed model. Each vendor exposes its own set of models, and admins choose which of them are enabled for the workspace.

Yes. In Limits, admins can enable or block entire vendors and individual models, and set a spending cap per model. Blocked models never appear in the chat model selector.

No. You can connect your own API keys for the providers you already use and rely on Intrascope-managed usage for the rest. Both options can run in the same workspace.

No. Manifests and project context are applied when the message is sent, so the same company, project and client background follows you when you change model.

Model availability is configured for the workspace, and project membership controls who works where. Together they keep sensitive or expensive work with the people who should be doing it.

ChatGPT Team gives your company seats with a single provider. Intrascope is a workspace across providers, with projects, reusable context, model-level controls and usage analytics on top of the chat itself.

No. Intrascope does not use your chats, prompts, manifests or workspace data to train AI models.

Creating a workspace, connecting a provider and inviting your first users takes minutes. Most teams begin with one project and one company manifest, then expand from there.

Ready to bring company AI usage under control?

Bring every approved model into one workspace, with the projects, shared context and spending controls your team needs to use them well.

7-day free trial ยท No credit card required